Thursday, August 20, 2009

Washington Square Press

In one of my first posts to this blog i mentioned my first brush with the work of Stephen Crane: picking up a copy of The Red Badge of Courage in my middle school's library. I had an image of that cover in my mind all these years since, but i only recently found a photo of it online:



The soldiers drew me in. I only wonder if the cover wasn't quite so cool, when if ever would i have discovered Stephen Crane for myself? So i'd just like to thank the publisher, Washington Square Press, for catching my eye. There is also a Signet paperback with an almost identical cover:


I don't know where that Civil War photo comes from, so if you do please leave a comment below. Just don't say Matthew Brady or you'll be shot with a rusty cartridge. It's a great photo, and i remember as i kid i was trying to decide which Red Badge character would be which soldier in the photo. I suppose for me, Henry is the one in the second row from the front, on the right, and Wilson is the leaning guy on his left. What do you think? And who are the rest of them?

After getting hooked by the Red Badge i then went to the public library looking for Crane books and found this edition of Maggie & other stories, which also happens to be published by Washington Square Press:

Monday, July 27, 2009

RETURN of the LANTHORN

No doubt you remember our April 2009 post about Stephen Crane signed copies of the Lanthorn Book available for sale. Well, as proof this blog is fast becoming the cutting edge of all things Crane, we've now seen one of the mentioned copies sold at auction earlier this month!

RR Auction of Amherst New Hampshire sold copy #38 of the Lanthorn in their July online auction. (The listing has already been taken down and replaced with the August auction items, and their past auction database is not currently functional). It sold for $3944 with the 20% buyers premium factored in. This is the same copy that was listed for sale by University Archives. John Reznikoff of University Archives is also affiliated with RR Auction.

The University Archives listing offered the book for $5,000. The RR Auction selling price of $3944 is respectable, but quite a bargain considering how rare the Lanthorn is, and considering the overall values of Crane signatures. The economy certainly has something to do with it. Also this Lanthorn book did have some stains, including a slight one under Crane's signature. Based on this result i personally wouldn't place any Crane signed items on the auction block right now.

It's interesting to take a look at how the Lanthorn Book fared against its fellows in the same Auction category (July 2009, Art & Literature, RR Auction). Among the top seven single-item sellers, Crane's Lanthorn placed right smack in the middle...

$5407 Mark Twain portrait of Howells or Laffan
$5251 Hemingway signed book For Whom The Bell Tolls
$4339 TE Lawrence autograph letter signed
$3944 Stephen Crane signed Lanthorn book #38
$3876 Charlotte Bronte clipped signature
$3586 Ernest Hemingway signed photo
$3259 Mark Twain signed photo


We should also note that this was described as a Stephen Crane signed book, with the other less famous signers being pretty much ignored in this case, poor boys!

Oh, and who was the buyer of this wonderful Lanthorn? Dear Sir, Madam, or Soulless Corporate Entity, you have exquisite taste, if you are reading this please leave a comment below and out yourself!

Saturday, July 11, 2009

Dog abuse story

We are now well into July. The heat, laziness and adventure of the summer season plants a three-letter word in our heads so we can't stop thinking about it. That's right.....DOG. These strange creatures go hand-in-hand with the summertime, so i've excavated a dog story from the Crane canon, A Dark Brown Dog.

I want to warn all the PETA people and Obama voters that this is quite a disturbing dog story. In fact it reads as softcore porn for the Michael Vick circle. So if you're really not up for reading, then don't. I also want to stress that Stephen Crane was a great animal lover, especially with dogs and horses, so don't misread the message of this story...

A Dark Brown Dog by Stephen Crane

It's quite a simple story. A boy is walking around when he encounters a small dog, beats the hell out it, it follows him home, the family grudgingly accepts the dog then beats the hell out of it. The boy and dog are friends. The dog gets killed. Whoops did i forget to say ***SPOILER ALERT***

Over the course of the story the poor dog is beaten with the following items (and we are lead to believe, many more that aren't specifically stated):

-fist
-stick
-rope
-foot
-saucepan
-brooms
-coal
-coffee pot

It is also abused in the following ways:

-dragged up a staircase
-chased around a room
-underfed
-verbally abused
-lifted up by one leg
-swung about head
-thrown from fifth story window

As i said in my intro, this is quite shocking to most modern readers, Vick circle excluded. Was such dog abuse common in the late 19th century? Probably moreso than it is today. And what is the purpose of this story then? Perhaps to show how ridiculous and mean the humans look when they abuse this innocent dog. Why am i posing questions then answering them myself? In the hopes that students will copy my answers verbatim and fail their literature classes.

Personally i'd rank A Dark Brown Dog quite low when compared to the rest of the Master's stories. I suppose you could say it's an early animal rights piece, but what would the contemporary readers' reaction have been other than 'Awww,' 'Har!Har!Har!' and 'Golly gee let me stop beating my own dark brown dog so frequently!' ?

This story is more fun if you remove the dog from it entirely, and substitute the name of one of your least-favorite celebrities. For instance, here is an excerpt that substitutes TV know-it-all Dr. Phil McGraw for the dog....

"The child's practised eye instantly noted his father's state. He dived under the table, where experience had taught him was a rather safe place. Dr. Phil, lacking skill in such matters, was, of course, unaware of the true condition of affairs. He looked with interested eyes at his friend's sudden dive. He interpreted it to mean: Joyous gambol. He started to patter across the floor to join him. He was the picture of Dr. Phil en route to a friend.

The head of the family saw him at this moment. He gave a huge howl of joy, and knocked Dr. Phil down with a heavy coffee-pot. Dr. Phil, yelling in supreme astonishment and fear, writhed to his feet and ran for cover. The man kicked out with a ponderous foot. It caused Dr. Phil to swerve as if caught in a tide. A second blow of the coffee-pot laid him upon the floor."

Doesn't that make the story much easier to swallow now? Which raises another question; Are people bothered more by the suffering of animals than the suffering of their own species? Um, i dunno. And we've thrown Dr. Phil out the window so we can't even ask him...

Sunday, June 28, 2009

RW Stallman inscribed book

Well the period of mourning for Stephen Crane is now over, and it's time to get to the business at hand. Just so happens we at Crane Crusaders central division recently acquired a very interesting Crane item. It's a copy of the Crane Omnibus inscribed by RW Stallman! Here is the seller's description:

STEPHEN CRANE: AN OMNIBUS. New York: Knopf, 1961. Fifth printing of the first collected edition. Edited, with an Introduction and notes, by Robert Wooster Stallman. Presentation copy inscribed by Stallman "For President and Mrs. Homer Babbidge" and dated Christmas 1963. Homer Babbidge was president of the University of Connecticut from 1962-1972, and the university's library now bears his name. Stallman has also added a notation beneath his inscription indicating the pages that reference 19th century Connecticut author John William de Forest (1826-1906). In Stallman's introduction to The Red Badge of Courage here, he notes how de Forest's graphic "modern" military realism preceded Cranes by a quarter century. 703 pp. 8o. Red cloth with gilt titles.


This book was exciting for me on a number of levels. It's a Crane book that i didn't have. It's signed by RW Stallman, a very cool literary scholar. It's a gift to Homer Babbidge, namesake of UConn's library. And the inscription references a Connecticut author as a precursor to Crane. Since i was raised in Connecticut this book was just too good to pass up.



When i buy stuff like this i get the guilty feeling that it belongs in a library or a museum! At least until i remember i'm a literary nerd, and no one really cares for this stuff anymore except a hardcore group of us! Well it has found a good home with my collection.

I'm also kinda curious how the book made it from Babbidge's hands to mine. The seller said it comes from the library of George deForest Lord, the author and Yale professor born in 1919. Assuming Mr. Lord is a relative of the deForest author mentioned by Stallman, maybe we can assume that Babbidge sent it along to him? Jeez, talk about re-gifting!

This book didn't cost very much, or i wouldn't have been able to afford it. This is a one-of-a-kind item, and i'd bet that Stallman signed books are pretty hard to find. As for authenticity, i think we're pretty safe....i mean come on people, who would bother to forge something like this?!

Anyway i'm glad to welcome this book into my Crane collection. If you're excited as i am about this, leave a comment below...

Friday, June 5, 2009

Rest in Peace

Alas, today is the day Stephen Crane died! Cora took his body back to the States and he was buried in Evergreen Cemetery (Hillside, New Jersey). It's so hard for humans to deal with death. We sort of fumble through the burial process and take grieving as a personal matter, while at the same time we've got to get on with our own lives.

The Upturned Face, one of Crane's Spanish-American War stories, deals with this topic. Here is the text of this extremely short story. It was first published in Ainslee's Magazine just a few months before Crane's death. And here is a short film version, directed by Edward Folger in 1972.

Take a few moments to appreciate Stephen Crane this week! The man was a great artist with rare gifts, and though his life was short, we're lucky to have today what he left behind.

Sunday, May 31, 2009

The End is Near

As Polly said to Manuel in the "Basil the Rat" episode of Fawlty Towers..."Prepare yourself for a shock!" Our hero Stephen Crane has less than a week's worth of life left in him! Right now he & Cora are at a health spa in Badenweiler, Germany, being attended to by the finest quack doctors. Granted, this all happened back in 1900. I'm not so good at math but i'll call that 109 years ago. Still for those of us who love Stephen Crane, the passage of time doesn't blunt the impact of his death any. Imagine the body of work he would have created had he lived to a decent age! Imagine the wealth of Crane artifacts we'd have if he only would have survived into the 1940's or '50's! How would World War I, the Roaring Twenties, the Great Depression, and World War II have influenced Mr. Crane's work. Ugh, we'll never know for sure! These are sad days for us! Check back in June 5th for more wailing and lamentation...

Sunday, May 17, 2009

The Monster

Today i'd like to take a look at The Monster, a story that i'd say ranks comfortably as Crane's best Whilomville tale & in the top ten of his overall short stories. The complete text of The Monster can be found here.

Henry Johnson works as stable minder for the Trescott family, and in his personal life is a well-respected man (a dandy) in the black community. One night there is a fire at the Trescott home and Henry, second man on the scene, rushes into the burning house to save the young boy Jimmie. Henry carries the boy downstairs but they become trapped in Dr. Trescott's laboratory. Trescott kicks the door down from outside and rescues his son, who is ok due to having been wrapped in a blanket and dropped near the window by Henry. Another man rushes inside to drag Henry out of the lab, but by this time he's been severely burned by fire and flaming chemicals spilling onto his head.

Dr. Trescott manages to keep Henry alive but he's disfigured, described as having no face. He's also gone insane somehow, which is not explained by Crane in what is perhaps the story's main weakness. Did the shock of his mangled mug cause him to snap like the Joker? This seems likely considering Crane portrayed Henry as someone who took excessive pride in his appearance. However, in the post-fire Henry we see no hint of self-awareness, in fact he'll escape to stroll about the town peering in at kids and calling at his girlfriend's house as if nothing is wrong.

Immediately after the fire Henry is hidden away at a neighbor's house, and the newspaper is allowed to print his obituary. The neighbor, Judge Hagenthorpe, is the first one to question the wisdom & morality of keeping Henry alive in such a pathetic state, but Dr. Trescott points out that Henry saved his son's life. The judge of course realizes this and delivers one of the best lines of the story, "It is hard for a man to know what to do."

As he recovers Henry is shifted to the home of Mr. Williams, a former friend of his. Trescott is paying Williams $5 a week to board Henry, but due to his disfigurement and insane rantings, Henry is kept locked in a room by the terrorized Williams family. One night Henry escapes and wanders about the town, peering in the window where a childrens' party is taking place, and scaring the little Winters girl. He then calls on his girlfriend and her mother in "Watermelon Alley," sending them both running in fear. Finally he startles an Irish woman and is chased by a mob, only to escape until he's rounded up by the police early in the morning.

Dr. Trescott is summoned to collect Henry from jail, advised to bring a mask or a veil to hide Henry's face from onlookers. After the escape the entire town becomes upset with Dr. Trescott for keeping such a "monster" alive and in their vicinity. The social fallout is such that Trescott loses most of his clients and becomes the least-popular doctor in town. The Judge and several prominent businessmen, acting out of concern for Trescott's status, advise him to send Henry to live far away from the town, suggesting a remote farm or a public institution. But the doctor refuses to do so, instead keeping Henry under his own roof.

In the final scene his wife, Grace, is weeping due to having only received one visitor for her weekly social. Trescott counts 15 unfilled tea cups that had been set out on the table. This could be the saddest display of the story, and we're left wondering if Trescott will give in and discharge Henry for the sake of his family.

Crane does an excellent job of portraying a universal reaction to the disfigured "monster." Whites, blacks, young, old, rich, poor, women, men, and authority figures all react poorly to Henry despite knowing his tragic & heroic history. In fact the boy he saved from the fire, Jimmie, even leads his friends in tormenting Henry, his face now hidden by a veil. Only Dr. Trescott stays loyal to the man who saved his son, and it's questionable whether the doctor has done Henry the greatest disservice of all, by nursing him back to health despite his dreadful state.

One thing to note is Crane does hint that the town's women are to blame for the adverse reaction to Henry and Dr. Trescott, in fact he has one of the "prominent" town leaders state this twice in private consultation with the doctor. Crane also shows a lengthy gossip session done by women, and a mother calling her child away from playing in the Trescott yard. Yet the men are shown just as guilty in the social mess, with Mr. Winter, father of the little girl frightened by Henry, acting as top enemy against Trescott. A common undercurrent in Crane's works, i think, is to hint that women are to blame for various episodes of tragichaos as the underlying spark, yet it is the male characters who actually commit the main offensive actions in his stories, with the women portrayed quite naturally or even admirably. Perhaps Crane is dangling them as a red herring for the reader who'll want an easy explanation. Yet who of any earthly experience can't recognize the power & influence of women in all things social?

In only one sense has The Monster, first published in 1898, failed to age well. This is the shock the modern reader will experience from the old racial stereotypes employed against some of the black characters, their exaggerated dialog, and the outright racism of some of the white characters. Yet Crane makes the latter eventually feel shame or look foolish, as the man who speculates that Henry got tired and knocked over a lamp, starting the fire, only to be rescued by Dr. Trescott. In reality a black man is hero of the story, a white man is the only one loyal to him, and black and white society react in exactly the same way to the "monster."

When it comes to the social stigma of disfigurement, the story is especially relevant today, as face transplants have been in the news. Victims of fire, car accident, shootings, animal maulings, acid attacks, and birth defects all suffer, and only now is there any hope that our relatively primitive medical capabilities can help them lead normal lives. So Henry Johnson is hardly a character merely in fiction, he could be any one of us. I have seen two people in public who could be described as having "no face," and it is virtually impossible not to stare a beat too long at first, or look away quick then glance back at them, wondering what happened. It is a fright instinct that humans have and like it or not we rely on cursory superficial data before the more intelligent forces kick in. Thus, a wounded human being could very easily become a "monster," and disrupt an entire town's sense of peace.